Comparative overview of national protection statues in the EU and Norway : EMN Synthesis Report for the EMN Study 2019
Abstract
This Synthesis Report presents the main findings of the European
Migration Network (EMN) study ‘Comparative overview of national
protection statuses in the European Union (EU) and Norway’.
The study explores the key characteristics of non-harmonised
protection statuses and the types of national statuses granted
by Member States and Norway to address a protection need not
covered by international protection statuses as set out in the
Qualification Directive or temporary protection in the Temporary
Protection Directive.
The report includes an overview of national statuses granted
by particular protection ground, reviewing the conditions and
rights associated with each. It also considers commonalities
and differences with the minimum standards established at EU
level for the EU-harmonised statuses (refugee status, subsidiary
protection and, in one case, temporary protection).
This assessment is timely, in light of efforts undertaken since
2016 to strengthen the Common European Asylum System
(CEAS) to complement existing legal pathways to admit those
in need of protection to the EU, including the proposed Union
Resettlement Framework Regulation and, increasingly, other legal
pathways for persons in need of protection.
Description
1. Introduction ; 2. Overview and mapping of types of national protection statues ; 3. Constitutional asylum ; 4. Collective protection ; 5. Protection based on "general" humanitarian grounds ; 6. Protection based on exceptional circumstances ; 7. Protection statues available for climate change reasons and natural disasters ; 8. Protection based on medical reasons ; 9. Protection status on the basis of the nonrefoulement principle ; 10. Protection statues available for minors, unaccompanied and aged-out minors ; 11. Protection statues available for beneficiaries of special programmes (relocation, resettlement) ; 12. Main developments sincw 2010, current debates and challenges ; 13. Conclusion